I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
if (largest != i) {
，推荐阅读Line官方版本下载获取更多信息
Афганистан начал новые атаки возмездия на границе с ПакистаномAriana News: Афганистан начал новую волну атак на границе с Пакистаном。关于这个话题，搜狗输入法2026提供了深入分析
Что думаешь? Оцени!